Scheme of work planning with CENTURY data

Posted on 12th November 2024

Posted by CENTURY

Estimated reading time: 4 minutes

Share:

CENTURY is an online learning platform that uses AI to personalise learning and provide teachers with actionable insights to support their teaching. Taryn Davison has over ten years’ experience as a primary teacher and Maths Lead. Now working in our Customer Success team training our schools and colleges, she wanted to put our CENTURY training to the test as well as use our new benchmarking data reports in a real-life setting. She taught a CENTURY maths lesson weekly for half a term to a Year 4 class at St. John’s C of E Primary School, Abram. Part of Quest Academy Trust, St. John’s has been using CENTURY for the past six years. This blog series shares her findings.

Having the year 4 class complete the topic diagnostic in lesson one, I was free to analyse the data in detail in order to best inform my planning. I would argue that you should do this at the start of every unit of work, especially as you don’t need to mark it! 

Identifying curriculum objectives:

Alongside some teacher assessment, I looked at diagnostic data to see how to spend my time over the course of the next 5 weeks based on questions they got wrong in decimals. CENTURY told me the curriculum objectives I needed to focus on. Teacher assessment helped me determine the pitch of my lessons. 

Data from Nuggets tab
This data was downloaded from the Nuggets tab on the day the students completed the diagnostic. I then added the percentage correct for each question. This is available on the platform as a graph but I needed the percentages because I wanted to track progress in each area.

Identifying revision areas:

Looking at the previous unit of work on Fractions, I identified the areas in the diagnostic where a specific group of students had struggled. I made sure to include an opportunity for them to work with an adult in the series of lessons to target the areas they did not understand from the previous unit of work, before the concept had been forgotten.

Data from Nuggets tab
This data was downloaded from the Nuggets tab on the day the students completed the diagnostic. I then counted the number of incorrect students. For the purposes of anonymity, I have provided it in this format, but this is clearly presented in the platform with the names of students who answered the questions incorrectly.

Stretch and challenge:

I identified those students in the diagnostic who had got the planned lesson objectives correct and I made sure that I provided them with personalised activities to push them in the relevant lessons.

Data from the Nuggets tab
This data was downloaded from the Nuggets tab on the day the students completed the diagnostic. I then counted the number of incorrect students. For the purposes of anonymity, I have provided it in this format, but this is clearly presented in the platform with the names of students who answered the questions incorrectly.

Support:

I reviewed the students’ average scores in the Year 4 mathematics course, focusing on those who performed poorly on the diagnostic. After further in-class assessment, it was clear that none of these students were meeting age-related expectations for Year 4—or even Year 3—and typically needed adult support in class. With this insight, I ensured they had access to relevant physical and visual representations of concepts, manipulatives, and appropriately scaffolded work during full-class activities, allowing them to better engage with the learning material.

The students with the lowest scores in the Year 4 Maths course
This image is available on the Courses Page. I selected the Year 4 Maths course, filtered for the current academic year and ordered the data by average last score.

‘Quick Wins’ in class:

Using the question breakdown, it is possible to see where students have struggled within a concept and then quickly address it. I did this in a variety of ways: one to one support with an adult, group work with an adult, or whole class explanation of a specific misconception. Each of these interventions were targeted by CENTURY data.

Graph in Nuggets tab
This graph is visible in the Nuggets tab after a class has completed a nugget. You can see question 8 has the highest number of incorrect answers. It’s possible to open up question 8 to see student responses.

Takeaways for using data: 

  • High-performing students: Able to know where students are going to need to be stretched in advance of your lesson.
  • Students working below Age-Related Expectations (AREs): Able to put together a series of packs of manipulatives to help build children’s confidence in different areas. Diagnostic data will inform which students to target with these.
  • Addressing misconceptions: Keep an eye on the nugget results when using CENTURY in class. This will tell you where to target your support in the most effective manner.

Tune in next week to hear how Taryn used CENTURY learning material to inform her lesson plans. Click here to book a demo of CENTURY.